Moving on to Baron and A Better Pencil. We are constantly posting on Facebook and Tweeting and texting and because of this our grammar has supposedly gotten worse...how is it then that there are still Grammar Nazi's lurking in the shadows. People still correct each other's grammar in these forums and there are even those that send the grammatically correct text (gasp!). There's even a Facebook page called Grammar Police that calls out people's grammatical errors.
The supposed degradation of our language is contributing to what Baron calls Teknofear. This fear of technology taking over and destroying our lives has caused things like the Unabomber attack. I think it is an irrational fear. While we are getting more technologically savvy, people adapt and still maintain forums in which correct grammar must be used.
There are problems with this technology as Baron points out. Once we send something we can't take it back. Once it's out in cyber land it's there...so you really have to think about what you want to say. On the other hand Baron says that we react to things quickly but with no wisdom. We can respond so quickly that we don't think first. Even though we can respond quickly we are only human and want to avoid awkward conversations and miscommunications. For these reasons people do actually think before they send especially if there in a situation where they want to make a good impression on someone.
I did however like what Baron said about the keyboard and not the pencil being the connection to our inner thoughts. Basically everyone has a computer or at least knows how to type. You don't have to learn how to hold a pencil or form letters. You just start typing and immediately your thoughts are on paper (using the term very loosely).
Thursday, February 28, 2013
Week 6 Ong ch 4-7 and Helvetica
Continuing on with Ong we
talked about technology and grammar. I
found it interesting that Ong brought up the point that an abundance of books
makes men less studious. I actually
think this is true. As an English major
I am constantly surrounded by books and the only daily assignments I have to do
are reading books. But because I am
bombarded with books every day I find I want to read them less. I feel like all I do is read and therefore
the thing I really don’t want to do is read.
When I was younger reading was fun and I liked to do it in my spare time
(which I don’t have any of now) and it was a rare treat. Now when my friend says you should read this
book I say Nah I think I’d rather do something else.
Another point that made me
think was that grammar rules are in your subconscious and that you can’t teach
them to other people. This is because
there is a disconnect between what’s in your mind and what you put on paper. I
had edit a document in my technical editing class and fixing grammatical errors
was the hardest part. I knew things
sounded wrong but I didn’t know why.
Even after I read a chapter about grammar in our textbook I still felt
lost. This also reminded me of trying to
learn grammar rules in Spanish. I’ve
been taking it for years but still have to think of a sentence in English and
conjugate it in my head.
This week we also watched the
documentary Helvetica. I had no idea that there was so much history
behind a single font. I also didn’t realize
there was such a thing as typeographers and type designers who devote their
lives to inventing new typefaces. I don’t
know where I thought they came from I guess just sprouted out of the ground
somewhere?
It
was pretty cool too that the Swiss have their own typeface (you need to get on
that America!) .
It
was also interesting that at first Helvetica was popular and modern and stood
for a sense of openness and transparency, but in the 70s came to stand for the people
supporting the Vietnam War and big bad corporate America. And then came back through the grunge
movement of all things. Now it stands
for clean lines and minimalism.
Week 5 Ong Ch 1-3
This week we moved on to Ong. One of the things I found interesting in the
first three Ong chapters was that different cultures used writing for different
purposes.
In Mesopotamia they writing
was used to establish their empire and to keep affairs such as business
transactions in order. In Egypt a lot of
writing was used as propaganda to promote certain rulers and people of the
elite class. In China their writing was
centered around the art of divination and more mystical aspects of life. The Phoenicians used their writing mostly to
conduct business transactions and for things related to numbers. Mayan writing was centered around time and
events in history and Greek writing was mostly used to compose poetry and to
vote for senate members.
A question that Ong brought
up was that history is predominantly oral so how much of it was changed? If a
civilization that has writing conquers one that doesn’t they civilization with
writing can obliterate the one without and change or completely erase its
history.
Another argument that Ong
poses that I found interesting was when he said oral literature doesn’t exist
because it doesn’t have to do with writing.
My teachers have always used the term oral literature so I guess I just
adopted it. So when I read that passage
in Ong it shattered a little part of my world view which was kind of
scary…
The Homeric Question and the
fact that everything has an epithet attached to it in Homer’s works was also
interesting.
The study that was conducted
on illiterate and literate people was very intriguing. I thought it was strange that illiterate
people couldn’t recognize geometrical shapes; they assigned names to them. For example they’d call a circle a
plate. But I guess it makes sense since
they had no reason to know the names of geometrical shapes. It didn’t have a place in their lives.
My favorite thing that we
talked about was the “Everything is a Remix” video. I always use the phrase “there are no
original ideas” so that was very validating.
I’m kind of a Star Wars nerd so all the information about that was
really cool. I was a little mad a George Lucas afterwards, but I guess I can
forgive him. He was inspired by some
pretty interesting stuff.
I also thought it was interesting
that reading has pretty recently become a solitary activity and that people
used to always read out loud. I feel
awkward enough practicing a speech alone in my room let alone walking around
reading aloud to myself.
The last thing I particularly
enjoyed was the freestyle rapping.
Week 4 Powell 206-254, Breaking the Mayan Code
My favorite part of this week was watching the documentary Breaking the Mayan Code. It was full of cool facts that I didn’t
know about. I really didn’t know
much about the Mayans before I watched this documentary so it illuminated a lot
for me.
I had no idea the Mayans had books and that they were so beautifully
illustrated. I was so upset when I
saw all of those books being burned.
A huge part of a people’s culture was just destroyed right in front of
their eyes…shameful.
I also thought it was interesting that they valued time so much. The fact that they had specific “day
keepers” who could read the calendars and were in charges of keeping track of
important dates seemed so foreign.
I guess I’m just used to opening up my planner and having all the holidays
and everyone’s birthdays written out for me. My whole life is in that thing…
It’s also pretty amazing that there are 30 Mayan languages! How did they
keep all of that straight? I really liked when someone said (I don’t remember
who it was) said “words are the vehicles of history”. It is really true…words are how we are remembered. They’re what remain after we are
gone. It made me think of how
hundreds of years later we are required to take classes of Shakespeare…that’s
all we really have left of him.
This documentary showed just how much we can learn about a culture from
what they wrote, or drew.
Another thing I found to be really interesting was that glyphs could be
abstract and morph into each other or even be hidden behind each other. I feel like that could get really
confusing, but it made the Mayans even more mysterious.
I was also really intrigued by the calendar round that Fursterman
discovered. I think it is amazing
that they had technology like that back then. It also made perfect sense…maybe even more so than our
current calendar. Once they
discovered the day that marked the beginning of the calendar round and of time
in Mayan culture it seemed to unlock so many other parts of the code.
The importance of the invention of Xerox was also interesting. I didn’t realize how much simpler
making copies could make a process like deciphering glyphs. I thought it was really cool how they
could cut out the glyphs and arrange them on huge pieces of paper and put
together a whole story like a giant puzzle.
Finally I really liked that the Mayans put their books on altars. That’s where I think they deserve to be…well
the good ones anyway.
Week 2 Powell 100-205
This week we got more into the meat of things. Powell talked about
Egyptian writing. One thing I
found particularly interesting from this reading was that there are three
different forms of Egyptian writing: demotica, hieroglyphs, and hieratic. I thought it was pretty cool that the
Egyptians had different types of writing for different parts of their
lives. They separate their writing
for the common people from their sacred carvings, and priestly and literary
works. This concept reminded me of
how we use writing now. We have
our more informal writing that we would use to write an email to a friend (a
conversational tone), our formal writing used for things like the Bible and
official books and writing papers, and our informal writing that we use when we’re
texting someone about their date last night.
I also didn’t know that the Egyptians had a cursive script they used
that was faster than their normal writing, which is what ours was originally
used for and then went by the wayside…I still find myself using it when I want
to write quickly on paper.
Another thing I didn’t know is that they used their skirts as
desks. I don’t what I thought they
wrote on, but that’s pretty nifty…wish I could do that. I also thought it was
cool that scribes were part of the elite and spent their time in the company of
nobility earning a good wage. What happened to that?! I want to be a writer,
but I know I’m going to be eating Ramen noodles and living in a shack for most
of my natural life.
It’s pretty amazing that with all the technology we have now a lot of its
components are based on old technology. Scroll, trash bin…etc.
Week 3 Powell 1-99
This week we learned about the basic terminology concerning types of
writing. I had no idea there were so many different types. I always
just categorized writing into the basic sections of text, pictures, and some
combination of the two. The chapters in the Powell book we read opened up
a whole new world of writing for me. Now whenever I go anywhere I look at
signs and things and think hm is that a semasiograph or maybe a logograph? In a sense this new terminology has “ruined”
me. I analyze everything…it used
to just be books and movies, but now it’s signs and pictures too. So much for
ignorant bliss. I also thought it
was interesting that musical notes, math notations, and computer symbols are
considered their own kind of language.
I never really thought of them that way before. I hate math so I always tried to ignore
all the symbols it uses outside of how will these help me solve this problem?
In the first three chapters of Powell he also discusses some
misconceptions and problems with writing technologies. He scolded his readers for automatically
assuming that writing comes from pictures…which is what I was always taught…sorry
Powell… I liked what he said about writing only doing as much as it needs
to. When I would look at hieroglyphs
and pictograms…etc. I always thought wow this is doing so much! It’s creating
this beautiful art while telling a story and giving us a key to unlock the
history of an ancient civilization.
But I guess he’s right. In
context writing is kind of lazy. A
group of people need a way to communicate the word man so they draw a picture
of a man…that kind of thing.
It is interesting that writing was originally used for everyday mundane
things like business transactions.
I don’t know why we think it served some grander purpose, but I guess if
you see a pretty picture that represents 4 instead of just a number you assume
it stood for something more elaborate.
I also didn’t know anything about phonetic compliments. I never knew what the little nd at the
end of 2nd was called I just knew it went there. And I didn’t know that abbreviations
like St. for street had a name either.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)